Cases 21 - 30 of 630
Max-George v. Oath
as 23-40253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cecil Walter Max-George, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Oath, Incorporated, also known as Yahoo!, Incorporated and Verizon Communications, Incorporated
Sagastume v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00834
Petitioner:
Walter Arnoldo Sagastume
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allbritton v. Tangipahoa Parish Jail
as 3:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Walter Allbritton
Defendant:
Tangipahoa Parish Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Walter Lee Green, Jr
Defendant:
TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patzkowski v. Porter et al
as 6:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Walter Patzkowski
Defendant:
Karen Porter, Sheriff Scott Williams and Jayce Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Bexar County et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Walter Scott
Defendant:
Bexar County and Bexar County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00335
Petitioner:
Walter Lee Green, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant v. Cruz et al
as 3:2022cv00751
Plaintiff:
Walter Bryant, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Cruz and John Does
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorto v. Lumpkin
as 22-70013
Petitioner / Appellant:
Walter Alexander Sorto
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Moran v. LA Dept of Pub Sfty & Corr
as 22-30787
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Quinten M. Moran
Defendant / Appellee:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Kirt D. Guerin, Walter Gerald and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
