Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Johnson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2011cv02254
Petitioner:
Wilbert C Johnson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Rupert et al
as 6:2011cv00446
Plaintiff:
Wilbert C Johnson
Defendant:
John Rupert, Jody C Hefner, Dwayne E Dewberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Jones et al
as 1:2011cv00812
Plaintiff:
George Albert Jackson
Defendant:
Victor E Jones, Dean Dove, Calvin K McFerrin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Johnson v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 10-60553
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID C. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BARBERS EXAMINATION BOARD AS JOHN DOE NUMBER 2, STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT AS JOHN DOE NUMBER 3 and others
Kelvin Johnson v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-20156
Petitioner - Appellant:
KELVIN C JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Stults vs Currie, et al
as 9:2008cv00135
Plaintiff:
Michael Glenn Stults
Defendant:
Gary L Currie, Adam W Little and Gerard C Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Copeland v. Livingston et al
as 9:2008cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jesse Copeland
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Nathaniel Quarterman, Bill Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
as 3:2007cv00719
Plaintiff:
David C Johnson
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv03518
Petitioner:
Kelvin C Johnson
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
