Cases 31 - 40 of 4,895
Kirksey v. Leseur et al
as 7:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Kirksey
Defendant:
Chief FNU Leseur and C. Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orellana-Hernandez v. F C I Oakdale II
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Santos Orellana-Hernandez
Defendant:
F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Farr, Sr. v. Ponthler et al
as 9:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Willie Ned Farr, Sr.
Defendant:
Courtney Tracy Ponthler, Robert J. Burby, Jessie C. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lettieri v. Securus Technologies
as 3:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
David C Lettieri
Defendant:
Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. United States of America - B.O.P et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Randall Little
Defendant:
United States of America - B.O.P, C Stern, Dr. FNU Winger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenfield v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01560
Petitioner:
Brian C Frankenfield
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frankenfield v. Goodall et al
as 3:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
TDCJ Parole Division, Kenisha Turner and Gail Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briggs v. Unknown Defendants
as 1:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Damian Briggs
Respondent:
Unknown Defendant(s), Ms Hawkins, Cpt Trotman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sappington v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
William C. Sappington
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service, Memphis TN and Benton County, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rehart v. TDCJ
as 24-10354
Plaintiff:
Steven G. Rehart
Defendant:
TDCJ, Danny C. Diaz, Cellmate at TDCJ, OIfficer FNU Blackshire, Officer at TDCJ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
