Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Antonio Cuevas v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-11144
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIO CUEVAS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Cuevas v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv00756
Petitioner:
Antonio Cuevas
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oscar v. Fox
as 1:2009cv00213
Petitioner:
Cuevas Oscar
Respondent:
John B Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cuevas v. Bordelon et al
as 2:2009cv02731
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Cortez Cuevas
Defendant:
Justin Bordelon and M. Cole
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jenkins v. Ivy et al
as 4:2008cv00508
Plaintiff:
Anitra Deshea Jenkins
Defendant:
Demetrius Ivy, Michael Kelly, Rafael Cuevas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dias v. Dixon
as 5:2008cv00130
Petitioner:
Jose Cuevas Dias
Respondent:
Kerry Dixon
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cuevas-Manjarrez v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv00470
Plaintiff:
Roberto Cuevas-Manjarrez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
United States Of America v. Cuevas-Medina
as 3:2007cv00220
Defendant:
Martin Cuevas-Medina
Petitioner:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alvarez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2007cv00107
Plaintiff:
Henry Cuevas Alvarez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Constance Reese, Anthony Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cuevas-Mendoza v. United States of America
as 7:2007cv00088
Plaintiff:
Dionicio Cuevas-Mendoza
Defendant:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
