Cases 31 - 40 of 212
Kendrick v. Harris County, Texas
as 4:2021cv04068
Plaintiff:
Khari Kendrick
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waters v. Fairly et al
as 1:2021cv00315
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Waters
Defendant:
Bobby Fairly, Tyler Pruitt, George County Correctional Staff and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dugas v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2021cv00530
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jermain Dugas
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy, Carl Smith, Kendrick Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division (CID) et al
as 9:2021cv00216
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Stewart
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division (CID) and Donald Muniz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2021cv00408
Petitioner:
Kendrick Bailey
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
Waters v. Pruritt et al
as 1:2021cv00192
Defendant:
Unknown Christensen and Chris Pruritt
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Antwain Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waters v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Waters
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
M.D.O.C., George County Correctional Facility and Bobby Fairley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hooker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00188
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Kendrick Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. USA
as 4:2021cv00261
Petitioner:
Kendrick Thompson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Henderson v. Wilson et al
as 3:2021cv00056
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Lantrell Henderson
Defendant:
Judge Unknown Elmfinger, Madison County Circuit Court, Sheila Taylor and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
