Cases 31 - 40 of 6,236
Kingsley v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Kingsley, Sr
Defendant:
Nolen Bass and A Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCreary v. Russell
as 24-40367
Plaintiff:
Jody McCreary
Defendant:
Kerry L. Russell, Judge, Unknown Putmen, District Attorney and Unknown Unknown, Tyler Police Officer
Harvey v. Galveston Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harvey, Jr
Defendant:
Galveston Police Department and Officer L. Mearlon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Lauderdale County
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Dekoyius L. Reed, Sr
Defendant:
Lauderdale County
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stipe v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2024cv01327
Plaintiff:
Bruce L Stipe
Defendant:
Thomas Mitchell, Derek Mingo and Johnathan Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bodwin v. Collier
as 24-40213
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clyde Bodwin
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Juan M. Garcia, Michael O. McNeil and others
Dingle v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
Marthur L Dingle
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Christopher L Norsworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Angela N Chevalier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dingle v. Port Arthur Police Department
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Marthur L Dingle
Defendant:
Port Arthur Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
