Cases 31 - 40 of 991
Rodriguez v. Smith
as 7:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Eugenio Lopez Rodriguez
Defendant:
K. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. TDCJ Lopez Unit et al
as 7:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Justin Slade Taylor
Defendant:
TDCJ Lopez Unit and TDCJ Medical Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaycox v. TDCJ ID Agency et al
as 5:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Floyd Junior Jaycox
Defendant:
TDCJ ID Agency, Bryan Collier, John Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. USA
as 1:2023cv00180
Petitioner:
Cesar Lopez, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Armas-Lopez v. USA
as 1:2023cv00335
Petitioner:
Salvador Armas-Lopez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Odem v. Johnson
as 23-10884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Jarvis O. Johnson, Mailroom Supervisor, French Robertson Unit, Stanley Baldwin, Head Chaplaincy, French Robertson Unit, Paige Rutledge, Admin IV and others
Davis v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
David Joel Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Joe Lopez and Eric Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villarreal v. Harrison
as 3:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Segundo Pastor Lopez Villarreal
Defendant:
Warden C. Harrison
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lopez-Macias v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv01075
Plaintiff:
Rafael Lopez-Macias
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ortiz Lopez v. Lumpkin
as 3:2023cv00239
Petitioner:
Marcos Ortiz Lopez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
