Cases 31 - 40 of 2,388
Normand v. T. Weber B.
as 4:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Mark Eric Normand
Defendant:
T. Weber B.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Hill County Jail
as 4:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Eric James Clark
Defendant:
Hill County Jail, Sandy Lynn Cook, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 24-40102
Petitioner:
Mark Tyrone Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Weigel v. Gray et al
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
James Allan Weigel
Defendant:
Lori Chambers Gray, Jason Cox and Mark Kent Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarmon v. Core Health Medical Provider et al
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Ersala Jarmon
Defendant:
Core Health Medical Provider, Comal County Jail and Sheriff Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Pollan
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Christopher Casey Cook
Defendant:
Greg Pollan, Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics, John Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. Alexandria et al
as 1:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Alexandria, Mark Wood, Colin Radar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Andrede et al
as 5:2023cv01558
Plaintiff:
Phillip Garland Scott and Scott, P. Garland
Defendant:
Ofc. FNU Andrede and Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinkston v. Reeves et al
as 3:2023cv03143
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
Governor Tate Reeves, Commissioner Burl Cain, Kelly Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Turner et al
as 4:2023cv01212
Plaintiff:
Mark Austin Jordan
Defendant:
Deputy J. Turner and Deputy John Doe I 4:23-cv-1212-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
