Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 123
Willie Sharp, Jr. v. T. Werlich
as 16-30145
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIE B. SHARP, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: T. G. WERLICH, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Pollock
Sharp v. Werlich We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv02636
Plaintiff: Willie B Sharp, Jr
Defendant: T G Werlich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Taylor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv00858
Plaintiff: Jimmy Andrew Davis, Jr
Defendant: Greg Taylor, FNU Sharp and FNU Choates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Lee et al
as 1:2015cv00160
Petitioner: Timothy R. Sharp
Respondent: Ernest Lee and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sharp v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2015cv00453
Petitioner: Darryl W Sharp
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sharp v. Goodwin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv01646
Plaintiff: Mark Sharp
Defendant: Jerry Goodwin and Jude Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Louisiana State Penitentiary We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00501
Plaintiff: George Lee Sharp
Defendant: Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sharp v. Warden et al
as 3:2015cv00118
Respondent: James Caldwell and Unknown Warden
Petitioner: George Lee Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sharp v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 5:2015cv00302
Plaintiff: George Lee Sharp
Defendant: Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alex Howard v. Robert Eason, et al
as 15-10082
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALEX JARAUN HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee: ROBERT EASON, MICHAEL UPSHAW, PAUL MORALES and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?