Cases 51 - 60 of 227
Gozo v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv00196
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Service List, GEO Group Inc and others
Petitioner:
Makusha Gozo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00754
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv14735
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Alvarez v. McAleenan et al
as 5:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, SHAWN GILLIS and others
Plaintiff:
Josep Ramirez Alvarez
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00074
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv14642
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Yannezz v. Department of Homeland Security
as 5:2019cv00102
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security and Shawn R. Gillis
Plaintiff:
Marlon Yannezz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv11094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pokhrel v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv00118
Respondent:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, US Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Deepak Pokhrel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
