Cases 51 - 60 of 863
Moffite v. Huffman
as 3:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Derrick Dewayne Moffite
Defendant:
Bland Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. USA
as 4:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Derrick Hicks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Walker v. Bowie County Jail et al
as 5:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Willis E. Walker
Defendant:
Bowie County Jail, Judge Tidwell and Derrick McFallan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luckett v. Circuit Court of Madison County, MS et al
as 3:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Derrick Darnell Luckett
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Madison County, MS, Circuit Clerk Anita Wray, Public Defender J. Michael Duncan and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo v. Roesler
as 22-40214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Carrillo
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Roesler, Warden, Darin W. Marcinkevicius, Lieutenant, Virgil G. McMullen, Assistant Warden and others
Gildon v. Lumpkin
as 22-40154
Petitioner / Appellant:
Derrick Gildon
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Gilbert v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00834
Petitioner:
Derrick Deshawn Gilbert
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broussard v. Caldwell Correctional Center et al
as 3:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
Derrick J Broussard
Defendant:
Caldwell Correctional Center, Clay Bennett, Kevin Wyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murrell v. USA
as 4:2022cv00124
Petitioner:
Derrick Daeyon Murrell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wilson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00476
Petitioner:
Derrick Martin Wilson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
