Cases 51 - 60 of 926
Looper v. Jones
as 22-40579
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Delores Looper
Defendant / Appellee:
Dallas B. Jones, Federal Bureau of Prisons and 6 Unknown Employees
Glenn v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2022cv02675
Petitioner:
Debra Wallace Glenn
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Trevino v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 9:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
Ramiro Trevino
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ellis v. USA
as 22-10729
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Priscilla A. Ellis
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and Michael Caravajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons Director
Trevino v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
Ramiro Trevino
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. USA et al
as 2:2022cv02380
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Jackson
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Oakdale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fuentes v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv01667
Plaintiff:
Tony Fuentes
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
James B Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. United States
as 3:2022cv01618
Plaintiff:
James Michael Murray
Defendant:
United States and Federal Bureau of Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Younger v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv02222
Plaintiff:
Wesley Younger
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bush v. Watson
as 22-40418
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yusuf O. Bush
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. Watson, Unit Personnel Hansen, Lieutenant, Unit Personnel Maze and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
