Cases 51 - 60 of 2,644
Francis v. John Doe et al
as 6:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
John Doe and Table Company in TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedrick v. University of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jesse Alan Hedrick
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch, Robert Darling, Jeremy Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christie v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
David Christie
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lebron-Rivera v. State of Texas
as 24-50146
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Lebron-Rivera
Defendant:
State of Texas, Richard Gillete, Sheriff, Gary Painter, Sheriff and others
Dingler v. Wayborn
as 24-10183
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler
Defendant:
Bill Wayborn, Tarrant County Sheriff, Texas Commission on Jail Standards, Tarrant County Hospital District, doing business as John Peter Smith Health Network and others
McCall v. LSP Investigation Service et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Eric McCall
Defendant:
LSP Investigation Service, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. John Doe 7:24-CV-26-O
as 7:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Deunverelle L. Jackson and Deunjerelle L. Jackson
Defendant:
John Doe 7:24-CV-26-O, Katherine Rushing and Myriah Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
