Cases 71 - 80 of 123
Lewis v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2011cv00705
Defendant:
Trent Barton, Jonathan Butler, Robert Colley and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Tavares Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Use', Sr. v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
Calvin Phillip Use', Sr.
Defendant:
Nurse Atwood, Nurse Shephard, Dr. Abanga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Sharp et al
as 4:2011cv03720
Plaintiff:
Markie Mitchell
Defendant:
Lynette Sharp, Laura Nichols and Carolyn Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rickey Barnes v. David Johnson, et al
as 11-30729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKEY BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID JOHNSON, JASON GIROIR, TERRY SHARP and others
Melvin Shaw, Jr. v. David Sweetin, et al
as 11-20522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN SHAW, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID SWEETIN, Warden, D. REED, Correctional Officer and SHARP, Sergeant
Perez v. Dunbar
as 5:2011cv00113
Plaintiff:
Julio Perez
Defendant:
Chequita Y Dunbar, Tammy D Sharp and Jonathan P Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlos Kidd v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 11-40616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS RAY KIDD
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, RALPH BALES, Prisoner Rape Elimination Act Ombudsman, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director TDCJ and others
Oliver v. Gunnels et al
as 4:2011cv01445
Plaintiff:
Terrance L Oliver
Defendant:
R Gunnels, Captain Dawson, Ms. Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Williams et al
as 2:2011cv00724
Plaintiff:
Robert McQueen
Defendant:
D Williams, Sgt Osburn, Lt. Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Delaney et al
as 3:2011cv00165
Defendant:
Cody Butler, Tim Delaney, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
