Cases 71 - 80 of 1,464
Wheater v. Gallaird et al
as 3:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Billy Wheater
Defendant:
Karl Gallaird, Brandon Wilbanks, Sherry Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Crapo v. City of Brownsville et al
as 1:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
Adam Scott Crapo
Respondent:
City of Brownsville and Cameron County, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dillon v. E. Adrian Adams et al
as 2:2023cv03452
Plaintiff:
Errol Jeleel Dillon
Defendant:
Unidentified Parties, E. Adrian Adams and Zachary Grate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. USPS
as 23-40456
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Postal Service, Law Library McConnell Unit, Central Grievance Office and others
Crowley v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael Crowley
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Asst Warden Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tyler v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Tyler, Jr
Defendant:
Adam R Gonzales, Bryan Collier, Logan T Shedd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Tyler, Jr
Defendant:
Adam R Gonzales, Bryan Collier, Logan T Shedd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Adam Ramirez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00181
Petitioner:
Joe Adam Ramirez
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 23-20325
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. Adams et al
as 5:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Franklin Smith
Defendant:
FNU Adams, Vincent Romero and FNU LNU 5:23-CV-134-C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
