Cases 71 - 80 of 3,635
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathaniel Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 3:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Ladarius Carnilus Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Armstrong
as 24-50016
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jones
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Earl Helmer, Treyvon Hocutt and others
Jones v. Ballard et al
as 3:2023cv01702
Plaintiff:
LaDyon Jones
Defendant:
Ben Ballard, Lauren Milton and Courtney Chainey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. TDCJ
as 4:2023cv04849
Plaintiff:
Elvis Wayne Jones
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Trust Fund Officers, United States District Court Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Meyer et al
as 5:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Brent Meyer, Wanda Mason, Derek Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Vital Core et al
as 4:2023cv00240
Petitioner:
LeByron Jones
Respondent:
Vital Core, Dr. LeFleur, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. TDCJ Pardon and Parole Division et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Wayne Allen Jones
Defendant:
TDCJ Pardon and Parole Division and Shedrick Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanton v. Sharp et al
as 4:2023cv04767
Plaintiff:
Billy C Blanton
Defendant:
Lynn Sharp, Amber Ochoa, William J Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 23-20601
Petitioner / Appellant:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
