Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Granger v. Lumpkin
as 24-70001
Petitioner:
Bartholomew Granger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Guzman v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Bartholomew Antonio Guzman
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bartholomew v. Lafourche Parish et al
as 2:2021cv01695
Plaintiff:
Lucien Luke Bartholomew
Defendant:
Lafourche Parish, Correct Health and CorrectHealth Lafourche, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buchanan v. Barnes et al
as 4:2020cv00241
Defendant:
Sargeant Oldnes, Detention Officer Laston, Detention Officer Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartholomew Guzman v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-20162
Petitioner - Appellant:
BARTHOLOMEW ANTONIO GUZMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Richard Bartholomew v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 17-20721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD BARTHOLOMEW
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, WILLIAM H. JONES, III, Senior Warden, JAQUELINE BROWN, Disciplinary Captain and others
USA v. Bartholomew May
as 17-50817
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BARTHOLOMEW LAMAR MAYS
Granger v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2017cv00291
Petitioner:
Bartholomew Granger
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guzman v. Davis
as 4:2017cv00596
Petitioner:
Bartholomew Antonio Guzman
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bartholomew v. Livingston et al
as 4:2016cv02758
Plaintiff:
Richard Bartholomew
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, William H. Jones, III, Jaqueline Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
