Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Chavez v. Odessa Police Department et al
as 7:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Mario P. Chavez
Defendant:
Odessa Police Department, Chief Gerke and Detective Bear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2021cv00706
Plaintiff:
Edward Simmons
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, E. Brown, Unknown Verrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DuVall et al v. Bear et al
as 3:2018cv01028
Petitioner:
Kerrith DuVall
Respondent:
Warden Bear, US of A and Okla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. U.S. of A et al
as 3:2018cv00976
Respondent:
U.S. of A, State of Oklahoma and NFN Bear
Petitioner:
Dennis Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bear v. Ross et al
as 6:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Lance Xavier Bear
Defendant:
Peaches Ross, Unknown Walker and Unknown Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laurent v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Leo L. Laurent
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Unknown Horton, Unknown Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobby Burke v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 12-60317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY GENE BURKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARGARET BINGHAM, Superintendant - Central Mississippi Correctional Facility, ERNEST LEE, Warden Central Mississippi Correctional Facility - 3 Pearl, Mississippi and others
Turner v. Thaler et al
as 4:2011cv02370
Plaintiff:
Victor Randolph Turner, Jr
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, T O'Hare, A Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. O'Hare et al
as 4:2011cv02369
Plaintiff:
Victor R Turner, Jr
Defendant:
T O'Hare, Robert Quada and Bear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Hare et al
as 4:2011cv02364
Plaintiff:
Victor Randolph Turner, Jr
Defendant:
T.O. Hare, Robert Quada and Mr. Bear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
