Cases 1 - 10 of 254
Havard v. George County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Casey Thomas Havard
Defendant:
George County Correctional Facility, Terry Reid Rogers, Green County SMCI and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skelton v. Johnston et al
as 7:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Casey Skelton
Defendant:
Captain Holly Johnston, Deputy Stefanie Vickars, CO Joey Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Pollan
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Christopher Casey Cook
Defendant:
Greg Pollan, Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics, John Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01672
Plaintiff:
Corey Marquee Adams
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Tim Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas Keith Casey v. Wayne Reaud et al
as 1:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Douglas Keith Casey
Defendant:
Wayne Reaud, CIA, F.B.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaffney v. Collier
as 23-40622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Paul Sean Gaffney
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, April Zamora, Eric Pichardo and others
Casey v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03998
Petitioner:
Tony Henry Casey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Clay County Sheriff's Office et al
as 7:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jace Smith
Defendant:
Clay County Sheriff's Office, District Attorney Casey Hall, Detective FNU Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03118
Petitioner:
Tony H Casey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
