Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Pinkston v. Reeves et al
as 3:2023cv03143
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
Governor Tate Reeves, Commissioner Burl Cain, Kelly Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Chism
as 5:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith
Defendant:
Mrs. Peggy Chism
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Harris
as 23-60348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Doran Maurice Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Randy Harris, Sheriff Randall Tucker, Madison County, Mississippi and others
Smith v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Doran Maurice Smith
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Unknown Prosecutor, Sheriff Randall Tucker and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Chism et al
as 4:2020cv04361
Defendant:
Anthony Marquis Farmer and Daniel K Chism
Plaintiff:
Mark Audwin Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carruthers v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Plaintiff:
Walter Tremaine Carruthers
Defendant:
Joe McDonald, Mark Cossit, State of Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Galloway v. Wages et al
as 3:2020cv00007
Defendant:
Mississippi, Anna Robbins, Chris Robertson and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gilg v. Eveans et al
as 6:2018cv00050
Defendant:
James Chism, Mike Eveans, Cory Hall and others
Plaintiff:
David Allen Gilg, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. CO Compian et al
as 2:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
James L. Polk
Defendant:
CO Compian, CO Borrego, Muode St and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Wallace, et al v. Louisiana State, et al
as 15-31117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY CHISM
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA STATE, JAMES D. CALDWELL, also known as Buddy, LOUISIANA LEGISLATURE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
