Cases 1 - 10 of 466
Bonner v. West et al
as 5:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Bonner
Defendant:
John West, Asst Dir. Greg Martin, Dir. Robert Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
Benny L. Cole, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Reynolds and Ofc. FNU Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division et al
as 4:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Luther Elvis Cole
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Hooper
as 24-30095
Petitioner:
Bryan Cole
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Emerson v. Parker
as 24-40041
Petitioner:
Philip James Emerson, Jr.
Respondent:
Jerry Parker, Kevin White and Kelly Cole
Cole v. United States Of America
as 1:2023cv01482
Petitioner:
Harry Cole
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Aaron v. Hinds County et al
as 3:2023cv03084
Plaintiff:
Markcus J. Aaron
Defendant:
Hinds County, Deputy Unknown Dillard, Officer Unknown Shelby and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Louisiana
as 5:2023cv01406
Plaintiff:
Elbert Cole, III
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00858
Petitioner:
George Douglas Cole
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
