Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Grabert v. USA
as 2:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Demarcus Dave Grabert
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Thomas v. City of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Oscar Thomas
Defendant:
Bay St. Louis Police Department, Rachel Jewell, Steven Lee Saucier and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stafford v. Zwicke
as 23-50623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyrone Stafford
Defendant / Appellee:
Arnold S. Zwicke, Executive Sheriff, Guadalupe County Sheriff's Office, Magistrate Judges, Guadalupe County, County/District Attorney, Guadalupe County and others
Doresy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03244
Petitioner:
Dave James Dorsey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilburn v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00076
Petitioner:
Robert Dave Wilburn
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benard v. Prator
as 5:2022cv01245
Plaintiff:
Dave Benard
Defendant:
Steve Prator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stafford v. Zwicke et al
as 5:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Stafford
Defendant:
Arnold S. Zwicke, Magistrate Judges, County/District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Sheriff Trochesset
as 3:2021cv00291
Petitioner:
Sidney Dwayne Allen
Respondent:
Warden Dave Chevaldies and Sheriff Trochesset
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hasty v. Mulleneaux et al
as 3:2021cv03440
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hasty
Defendant:
Dave Mulleneaux, Sgt James Gambel and Dave Mullenix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2020cv03733
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Dave Ester Newman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
