Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Cannon v. Doskey et al
as 5:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Grover Cannon and Grover De
Defendant:
Dwight Doskey, Ramona Emanuel, Edwin Blewer, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv02555
Plaintiff:
Larry G Washington and Larry Grover Washington, I
Defendant:
United States of America and FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Washington v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Larry G Washington and Larry Grover Washington, I
Defendant:
United States of America and FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cannon v. Doskey et al
as 3:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Grover Cannon
Defendant:
Dwight Doskey, Ramona Emanuel, Edwin Blewer, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Rule et al
as 3:2021cv00323
Plaintiff:
Dennis Howard
Defendant:
Denise Grover, Barry Rule, James Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Rule et al
as 4:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dennis Howard
Defendant:
Denise Grover, Barry Rule, James Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ivey v. Stephens
as 1:2015cv00239
Petitioner:
Samuel Grover Ivey
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kokesh et al v. Obama et al
as 6:2014cv00159
Defendant:
John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Chester Alan Arthur and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Gumby and Adam Kokesh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Martin et al
as 2:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Curtis Shabazz
Defendant:
Barry L Martin, G S David, Michael B Grover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornwell v. Cain et al
as 2:2012cv02782
Plaintiff:
Grover Cornwell
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
