Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Pelko v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
John D Pelko
Respondent:
Sheriff J.C. Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dickey v. Hooper et al
as 2:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Douglas Dickey
Defendant:
Sheriff J.C. Hooper and Nueces County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelko v. Stith et al
as 2:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Pelko and John D Pelko
Defendant:
Judge David Stith, Sheriff J.C. Hooper, Nueces County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Verdin v. Soignet et al
as 2:2023cv02735
Plaintiff:
Solomon J. Verdin, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Soignet, Rhonda Ledet, April Tomlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
J.C. Foster
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Overstreet v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00352
Petitioner:
J.C. Overstreet
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Marsh v. Nueces County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Brandon Marsh
Defendant:
Nueces County Jail, Sheriff J.C. Hooper and Adolpho Riojas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guy v. Hooper et al
as 2:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Walter Kevin Guy
Defendant:
Sheriff J.C. Hooper, Anderson and Sgt Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Sheriff Hooper. J.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
Darrell Anthony Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Hooper. J.C., Deputy Ramos, Chief John Galvan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Agnew v. ABE Factor & Campbell et al
as 4:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Norman L Agnew
Defendant:
ABE Factor & Campbell, Mansfield Police Department, Barry Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
