Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jackson v. USA
as 2:2023cv00198
Petitioner:
Tyson Jamal Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jackson v. Mount et al
as 2:2022cv06206
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Jamal Jackson
Defendant:
Supervisor Mount, Deputy Jang, Deputy Red and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. USA
as 2:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
Tyson Jamal Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jackson v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2022cv00543
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jamal Jackson
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Dale Wainwright, Lorie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. TDCJ
as 4:2019cv04659
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jamal Jackson
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Director
as 6:2019cv00302
Defendant:
TDCJ Director
Petitioner:
Terrence Jamal Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. 16th Judical District et al
as 3:2019cv00309
Defendant:
Jackson Parish Detention Center, Concordia Detention Center, 16th Judical District and others
Plaintiff:
Jazmine Jamal Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. The State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2019cv00308
Defendant:
Louisiana State Penitentiary, The State of Louisiana, Elayne Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Jazmine Jamal Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Jackson v. Susan Pamerleau, et al
as 16-50498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMAL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN PAMERLEAU, Bexar County Sheriff, A. BANASCO, Jail Administrator Chief, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS and others
Jackson v. The State of Texas
as 5:2015cv00955
Petitioner:
Matthew Jamal Jackson
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
