Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Williams v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Ramondo Leon Williams, Jr. and Raymondo LeonLove Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, M.T.C. / Jenkins, M.T.C. / Pennington and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00066
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Tanner
as 5:2019cv00867
Defendant:
Robert Tanner
Plaintiff:
Leon Williams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter et al v. United States Government
as 1:2018cv00127
Petitioner:
Leon William Carter
Respondent:
United States Government and Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leon Williams, Jr. v. Keith Deville, Warden
as 17-30184
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEON WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
KEITH DEVILLE, WARDEN, WINN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Williams v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2016cv01923
Petitioner:
George Leon Williams, Jr
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2016cv01924
Petitioner:
George Leon Williams, Jr
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leon Williams, Jr. v. Jay Morgan, Warden
as 15-30363
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEON WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
JAY TIM MORGAN, Warden, Winn Correctional Center
Hankins et al v. Community Education Centers Inc et al
as 5:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Ashley Hankins , Kristal Hankins and Mary Barron
Defendant:
Community Education Centers Inc , Texas Bowie County , Leon Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Winn Correctional Center
as 5:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Leon Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Winn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
