Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Johnson v. Leake County Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv03038
Plaintiff:
Katelan Johnson
Defendant:
Leake County Police Department and Scott County Sheriff Department
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Leake Co. Police Officers et al
as 3:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alexander Moore
Defendant:
Leake Co. Police Officers and Jes Smith
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Woods et al
as 5:2018cv00269
Defendant:
Tina Kovar, Tine Buds, Gena Brisson and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Joe Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonnie Welsh v. Correct Care. L.L.C., et al
as 17-11522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE KADE WELSH
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECT CARE. L.L.C., MARSHA MCLANE, TCCO Executive Director, MICHAEL SEARCY and others
Harris v. Sistrunk et al
as 3:2016cv00870
Plaintiff:
La'Dale Harris
Defendant:
Michael Sistrunk, Adam Wade, Duck Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Leake et al
as 2:2015cv00294
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Michael Scott
Defendant:
Travis Leake, Cole Thurman, City of Amarillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruben Anderson v. F. Gooden, et al
as 14-40954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN SOLIS ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
F. GOODEN, Captain, PRESNELL, Lieutenant, LEAKES, Lieutenant and others
Anderson v. Gooden et al
as 5:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Ruben Solis Anderson
Defendant:
F Gooden, FNU Foster, FNU Presnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Grounds et al
as 5:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Ruben Solis Anderson
Defendant:
D Grounds, FNU Calfee, W Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee et al v. Leake County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2013cv00710
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee and Larry McDonald
Defendant:
Leake County Sheriff Department and Bank of Leake County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
