Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Pettieway v. Strenth et al
as 2:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
Marlon James Pettieway
Defendant:
Warden Strenth, L Jones, Nurse Julie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Colbert et al
as 3:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Terrell Davis and Stephon Peake
Defendant:
Warden D. Colbert and Captain Brown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Peake v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Stephon Peake
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Peake v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Stephon Bernard Peake
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Peake v. Edwards et al
as 2:2019cv02250
Defendant:
Stephenie Graham, Hellery Green and Daniel Edwards
Plaintiff:
Dane Peake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peaks v. Ash
as 9:2018cv00128
Defendant:
Frankie Ash
Plaintiff:
Darryl Peaks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Twin Peaks Investment LLC et al
as 6:2017cv00146
Defendant:
Manuel Chavez, Officer John Doe, Front Burner Restaurant GP LLC and others
Plaintiff:
William Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
White v. City of Waco et al
as 6:2017cv00306
Plaintiff:
Philip Ray White
Defendant:
City of Waco, Waco Police Department, Waco Bureau ATF/SWAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Fagan, et al
as 1:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
O C Hill, Jr
Defendant:
Lloyd Fagan, Russell Thomason and Gary Don Peak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Babu Kalluvilayil v. Classification Headquarters, et al
as 15-10454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BABU S. KALLUVILAYIL
Defendant - Appellee:
CLASSIFICATION HEADQUARTERS, EDDY WHEELER, Warden, R. LEAL, Assistant Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
