Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Deleon v. Miller
as 5:2022cv00251
Petitioner:
Rocky Deleon
Respondent:
Michael R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luster v. Vasquez Garcia et al
as 5:2021cv00022
Plaintiff:
George Daniel Luster, Jr
Defendant:
Michell R. Miller, Lieutenant Olivia R. Caudillo, D. Vasquez Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luster v. Vasquez Garcia et al
as 4:2021cv00207
Defendant:
D. Vasquez Garcia, Michell R. Miller, Lieutenant Olivia R. Caudillo and others
Plaintiff:
George Daniel Luster, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kamond Adams v. Michael Miller, et al
as 18-11097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMOND K. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL R. MILLER, Deputy Warden, WARDEN EDWARD PHARR, JR., CODY R. PARKER, Unit Major and others
Adams v. Miller et al
as 5:2017cv00281
Plaintiff:
Kamond K Adams
Defendant:
Michael R. Miller, Edward Pharr, Jr, Cody R. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamie Miller v. County of Choctaw, et al
as 15-60323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMIE L. MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF CHOCTAW, CLOYD HALFORD, Sheriff, Choctaw Sheriff Department and PEGGY R. MILLER, Choctaw Sheriff Department
Miller v. County of Choctaw et al
as 1:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jamie L. Miller
Defendant:
County of Choctaw, Cloyd Halford and Peggy R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. County of Choctaw et al
as 1:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
Jamie L. Miller
Defendant:
County of Choctaw, Cloyd Halford and Peggy R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2010cv00441
Petitioner:
Charles R Miller
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Cain et al
as 3:2009cv00416
Plaintiff:
Dale R. Miller
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Chad Oubre and Unknown McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
