Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Young v. King
as 3:2019cv00152
Petitioner:
Amir R. Young
Respondent:
Superintendent Ron King
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dortch v. Harris County Sherriff's Office c/o Harris County et al
as 4:2016cv03788
Plaintiff:
Javoall De Ray Dortch
Defendant:
Harris County Sherriff's Office c/o Harris County, Deputy R. Young and Detention V. Gamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Caddo Correctional Center et al
as 5:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
Rickey R Young
Defendant:
Caddo Correctional Center, Terry Henry, Deputy Prudomme and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. USA
as 3:2014cv00552
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles R. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hargraves v. Stephens County Jail, et al
as 1:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Jr Hargraves
Defendant:
Eric Brown, Lee Tidwell, Dan R Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Harden v. Dan Young, et al
as 11-11224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY HARDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN R. YOUNG, Sheriff, GEORGE WADE, Chief Deputy, JAMES BARRERA, Jail Administrator and others
Leatch v. Carvajal et al
as 5:2011cv00195
Plaintiff:
Edward Leatch
Defendant:
M.D. Carvajal and R Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden v. Young et al
as 1:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harden
Defendant:
Dan R Young, George Wade, James Barrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Lee County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2009cv00241
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ingram
Defendant:
Lee County Circuit Court, Lee County Adult Jail, Lee County Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cosner v. Lee County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 1:2009cv00005
Plaintiff:
Chris E. Cosner
Defendant:
Jim H. Johnson, Lee County Sheriff's Department, Joyce A. Lofton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
