Cases 1 - 10 of 1,587
Kingsley v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Kingsley, Sr
Defendant:
Nolen Bass and A Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Lauderdale County
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Dekoyius L. Reed, Sr
Defendant:
Lauderdale County
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Munoz, Sr. v. Cueto
as 5:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Munoz, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Emundo Cueto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. American Municipal Services et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jackson
Defendant:
American Municipal Services, Larry Bergman, Greg Pitchman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farr, Sr. v. Ponthler et al
as 9:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Willie Ned Farr, Sr.
Defendant:
Courtney Tracy Ponthler, Robert J. Burby, Jessie C. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 24-50333
Petitioner:
Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Kahoe v. Mel et al
as 3:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Mel, Unknown Johnson and Unknown Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kahoe v. Tiffany et al
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Tiffany, Unknown Peridoux and Unknown Staff Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kahoe v. Heemans et al
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Karen Heemans and Justin Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fregia v. Warden Marshall, et al.
as 6:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
Kirk Asa Fregia, Sr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
