Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Thomas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Stephen Silas Thomas
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silas v. McDonalds et al
as 1:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
Tworn Delance Silas, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown McDonalds, Unknown Fuller, Elaine Lege and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Director TDCJ
as 22-40574
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephen Silas Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Board of Pardon and Parole
Silas v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv00692
Petitioner:
Tammy Renee Silas
Respondent:
FNU Smith and Carswell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sila v. USA
as 3:2022cv01340
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ndungi Sila
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harris v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv00361
Plaintiff:
Silas Harris
Defendant:
U S Bureau of Prisons, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, FNU Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silas v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00928
Defendant:
Unknown Stewart, Rodney Jones, Billy Sparkman and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Brandon Silas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Babcock v. Davis
as 7:2019cv00206
Petitioner:
Silas Mark Babcock
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Black v. Jones et al
as 1:2019cv01023
Defendant:
W Peyton Cunningham, Axson Silas, Victor Jones and others
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Richard Wayne Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silas v. Franklin et al
as 3:2019cv00515
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Lt. Franklin, Joann Shivers and M.D.O.C.
Plaintiff:
Brandon R. Silas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
