Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Scoggins v. Williams
as 23-10902
Petitioner / Appellant:
Timothy Scott Scoggins
Respondent / Appellee:
Bryan Williams, as Senior, Acting Warden of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, John Middleton Unit and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Scoggins v. Williams
as 3:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
Timothy Scott Scoggins
Respondent:
Bryan Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Voss v. Soignet et al
as 2:2021cv00350
Defendant:
Dylan Fitch, Nick Daigle, Tim Soignet and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Voss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley v. Ehlers
as 1:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Beasley
Defendant:
Lori A. Ehlers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley v. Ehlers et al
as 1:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Beasley
Defendant:
Lori A. Ehlers, Elaine Ehlers and Vernon Ehlers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Stephens
as 3:2015cv00229
Petitioner:
Elliott Timothy Scott
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Elliott Scott v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-40630
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELLIOTT TIMOTHY SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Scott v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2013cv00554
Petitioner:
Elliott Timothy Scott
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy Harriman v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 13-40717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, FRANK HOKE and JOHN BECRAFT
Harriman v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2013cv00357
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Harriman
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID, Frank Hoke and John Becraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
