Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Trotter v. Loden et al
as 4:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Leon Lamar Trotter
Respondent:
Chad Loden and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz v. TDCJ et al
as 7:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
David Cruz
Defendant:
TDCJ, Sheriff Dept, Assistant Warden FNU Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. Davis
as 1:2020cv00363
Petitioner:
Roland Trotter
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Great Southern National Bank et al
as 3:2020cv00077
Defendant:
Great Southern National Bank, Alvin Paschal, Raymond Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Mario D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Decker v. Griffis et al
as 7:2019cv00067
Defendant:
J. Lujan, W. Stacy Trotter and Mike Griffis
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Wallace Decker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trotter v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 5:2018cv00105
Respondent:
Director TDCJ - CID
Petitioner:
Randy Terrell Trotter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Antonio Carrothers v. East MS Corrtl Facil Empl, et al
as 18-60123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO CARROTHERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY DEMPSEY, ARP Coordinator, OFFICER UNKNOWN TROTTER, Disciplinary Investigator, OFFICER UNKNOWN CHATTMAN, Disciplinary Investigator and others
Stafford v. City of Odessa, Texas et al
as 7:2017cv00256
Defendant:
Lawrence Barber, District Attorney Bobby Bland and Assistant, City of Odessa, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Stafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. Hall et al
as 3:2017cv00719
Plaintiff:
Milton Trotter
Defendant:
Pelecia E. Hall and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woods v. Griffis et al
as 7:2017cv00131
Defendant:
Bobby Bland, Adrian Chavez, Mike Griffis and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mark Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
