Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Hart v. Daniels
as 23-40639
Petitioner / Appellant:
Earl Francis Hart
Respondent / Appellee:
Charles Daniels, Warden, USP Beaumont
Hart v. Centurion Medical Provider, et al.
as 3:2023cv03001
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hart
Defendant:
Centurron Medical Providers, Dr. Jane Doe, Nurse Jane Doe and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Boyd
as 1:2023cv00915
Petitioner:
Aubrey Floyd Hart
Respondent:
Calvin Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valdes v. Hart
as 4:2023cv02568
Plaintiff:
Alain Alexis Valdes
Defendant:
Kela Marnesse Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keithley v. Vital Core et al
as 3:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Keithley
Defendant:
Vital Core and Dr. Karl Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Brumfield et al
as 5:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Darius Hart
Defendant:
James Brumfield, Richard Bynam, Herbert Young and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2023cv00165
Petitioner:
Earl Francis Hart
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Perry v. Hart
as 23-40246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adam Alexander Perry
Defendant / Appellee:
Austin J. Hart and Alvaro J. Banda, Jr.
Snellings v. Garcia et al
as 6:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Sidney Ray Snellings
Defendant:
Juan Garcia, Angela Johnson, ., Evelynn C. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. Employer's and Employee's of The Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 7:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Pena
Defendant:
Employer's and Employee's of The Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Bryan Collier, Jimmy S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
