Cases 21 - 30 of 331
Blakemore v. The City of Cuney, Texas
as 6:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Kevin Blakemore
Defendant:
The City of Cuney, Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Majors v. City of Canton et al
as 3:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Allyson Majors
Defendant:
City of Canton, Eric Gilkey, Rodriquez Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Kabouni v. City of Houston
as 4:2023cv01364
Plaintiff:
JAY KABOUNI
Defendant:
City Of Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Trevino v. City of Edinburg, Texas
as 7:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Oscar Trevino
Defendant:
City of Edinburg, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rodriguez v. City of Corpus Christi
as 23-40215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Annette Rodriguez
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Corpus Christi
Montgomery v. City of Pearsall, Texas
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Montgomery
Defendant:
City of Pearsall, Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Phillips v. City of Rusk, Texas
as 6:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Phillips
Defendant:
City of Rusk, Texas
Not Classified By Court:
Andy Tindel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Johnson v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Mike Johnson
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi and James Davis, Chief of Police
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gates et al v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi
as 1:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Derrick Gates, Robert Hornsby, Cory Mooney and others
Defendant:
City of Biloxi, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Young v. City of Shreveport
as 5:2022cv06167
Plaintiff:
Johnnie D Young
Defendant:
City of Shreveport
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Employment & Re-employment Rights of Uniformed Service Members
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
