Cases 91 - 100 of 223
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02561
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Pierce v. Livingston et al
as 6:2016cv01105
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Pierce
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, David G Gutierrez and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Kaden v. Chamisa Arts, Inc. d/b/a/ Trailwise Saddles and Trailwise Tack, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00307
Defendant:
Chamisa Arts, Inc. d/b/a/ Trailwise Saddles and Trailwise Tack, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David G Kaden
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
David Peake v. Yemisi Ayobami
as 16-90025
Petitioner:
DAVID G. PEAKE, Trustee
Respondent:
YEMISI AYOBAMI, also known as Yemisi Aregbe
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01821
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Fiamma Partners LLC v. Morningstar et al
as 3:2016cv01402
Plaintiff:
Fiamma Partners LLC
Defendant:
David G Morningstar , Caroline D Morningstar , Hilary B Radolec and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Renaud v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06680
Plaintiff:
David G. Renaud
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stacy Conner v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 16-40324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STACY L. CONNER
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, MICHAEL A. ROESLER, Head Warden Stiles Unit, DARREN B. WALLACE, Assistant Warden Stiles Unit and others
Harris v. Thaler
as 5:2016cv00142
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
David G. Harris
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
