Cases 111 - 120 of 193
Chi v. Daum et al
as 1:2020cv00112
Defendant:
cting Director MARK KOUMANS, Director Daniel Bible, Attorney General William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Munguh Pius Chi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00084
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00060
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00054
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garcia-Menocal et al v. McCarty Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv01007
Defendant:
Lamorak Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, Gardner Denver, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Jesus Garcia-Menocal, Ignacio Jose Garcia-Menocal, Victor Gustavo Garcia-Menocal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00037
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
U.S Bank National Association, not in its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT v. Cortez et al
as 4:2020cv00856
Defendant:
Jonathan Cortez, Jose Garcia, Jasson Pec and others
Plaintiff:
U.S Bank National Association, not in its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Davis
as 3:2020cv00066
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Juan Jose Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. E&C Promotions LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00171
Defendant:
Juan G. Trevino, E&C Promotions LLC and Jose Garcia Hernandez
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Juan Garcia
as 19-50373
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN JOSE GARCIA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
