Cases 11 - 20 of 102
Belcher v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
John Dwain Belcher
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belcher v. Reynolds
as 5:2022cv00015
Petitioner:
John Dwain Belcher
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belcher v. World Wide Transport, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Homer Belcher
Defendant:
World Wide Transport, Inc and John J Grissom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony et al v. Concept Logistics, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00601
Plaintiff:
Jon Colton Anthony and Sierra Ruiz
Defendant:
Concept Logistics, Inc. and Richard Belcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Stockfood America, Inc. v. Absolute Rights, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00239
Defendant:
River Media Group LLC, Absolute Rights, LLC, Perry Belcher and others
Plaintiff:
Stockfood America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Buchanan v. Belcher
as 1:2020cv00052
Plaintiff:
Mariah Buchanan
Defendant:
Larry Belcher, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FDIC v. Daniel Belcher
as 19-31023
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for First NBC Bank
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL BELCHER
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Belcher
as 2:2019cv12561
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Daniel Belcher
Petitioner:
Ernst & Young LLP
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1818
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Belcher
as 2:2019xc12560
Petitioner:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Respondent:
Daniel Belcher
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1818
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00711
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
