Cases 11 - 20 of 28
D'Ambrosio v. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
as 4:2019cv02668
Defendant:
Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph D'Ambrosio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. CarMax Auto Superstores Inc
as 4:2019cv00556
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores Inc
Plaintiff:
Todd Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardowin v. Carmax Business Services, L.L.C.
as 3:2019cv00145
Defendant:
Carmax Financial Services and Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Victoria Hardowin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
India Kahclamat v. William Nash, et al
as 18-10709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDIA SAMONE KAHCLAMAT, Intervenor
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM NASH, THOMAS REEDY, SARAH EDMONDSON, and Representatives on Behalf of and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
FILING ERROR
as 5:2014cv00868
Defendant:
BMW of North America, LLC and Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Erin L Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Spencer v. BMW of North America, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv00869
Counter Plaintiff:
BMW of North America, LLC
Defendant:
BMW of North America, LLC and Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Erin L Spencer
Plaintiff:
Erin L Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Rodges v. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00204
Plaintiff:
Tanya Rodges
Defendant:
Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fields v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
Jesse C Fields
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dao v. CarMax Auto Superstores Inc
as 4:2011cv02078
Plaintiff:
Hoa Dao
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
