Cases 11 - 20 of 349
Americans for Beneficiary Choice et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Americans for Beneficiary Choice and Senior Security Benefits, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Chiquita Brooks-LaSure and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
McComb Childrens Clinic, LTD. v. Becerra et al
as 5:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
McComb Childrens Clinic, LTD.
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Melanie Fontes Rainer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Baylor All Saints Medical Center et al v. Becerra
as 4:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Baylor All Saints Medical Center doing business as Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center - Fort Worth, Baylor Medical Center at Irving doing business as Baylor Scott & White Medical Center-Irving, Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie doing business as Baylor Scott & White Medical Center Waxahachie and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Roesel v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Phillip Roesel
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Center for Innovations in Evaluative Medicine, LLC et al v. Becerra
as 3:2024cv00362
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services
Claimant:
Center for Innovations in Evaluative Medicine, LLC d/b/a Warner Orthopedics and Wellness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Natl Infusion Center v. Becerra
as 24-50180
Plaintiff:
National Infusion Center Association, on behalf of itself and its members, Global Colon Cancer Association, on behalf of itself and its members and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, on behalf of itself and its members
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, In Her Official Capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
U.S. Anesthesia Prts TX v. HHS
as 24-10384
Plaintiff:
U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Texas, P.A., U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Florida, Incorporated, U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Colorado, Incorporated and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Robbins v. IMP Metro West, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Tiffany C Robbins and Tiffany C Robins
Defendant:
IMP Metro West, LLC, Voyager Indemnity Insurance Co., Assurant Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Corr-Williams v. FDA
as 24-60068
Petitioner:
Corr-Williams Company and Fontem US, L.L.C.
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Texas, P.A. et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Texas, P.A., U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Florida, Inc., U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Colorado, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
