Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Pirello v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv09528
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Pirello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Scallan v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02330
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Scallan
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
USA v. David Diehl
as 19-50165
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID ANDREW DIEHL, also known as David A. Diehl
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Andrew v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2018cv09604
Plaintiff:
David Andrew
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Research & Development LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Renson v. University of Texas Medical Branch Hospital et al
as 6:2018cv00239
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Renson
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch Hospital, Frank Leonard and Sarah Pierson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alana Cain, et al v. New Orleans City, et al
as 18-30352
Movant - Appellant:
DAVID ANDREW CHRISTENSON
Renata Singleton, et al v. Leon Cannizaro, et al
as 17-30896
Movant - Appellant:
DAVID ANDREW CHRISTENSON
Schmidt v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2017cv00465
Petitioner:
David Andrew Schmidt
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Schmidt v. Michael Roesler
as 17-41063
Petitioner - Appellee:
DAVID ANDREW SCHMIDT
Respondent - Appellant:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Adrian Caliste v. Harry Cantrell
as 17-30831
Movant - Appellant:
DAVID ANDREW CHRISTENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY E. CANTRELL, Magistrate Judge of Orleans Parish Criminal District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
