Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Hager v. Thomas et al
as 2:2018cv00139
Defendant:
Dexter Thomas, U.S. Xpress, Inc. and Paccar Financial Corp
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marion Hager v. Underwood
as 18-10913
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARION DAVID HAGER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNDERWOOD, Warden
Sprint Communications Company, v. Amherst Telephone Company, et al
as 18-10821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.
Defendant - Appellee:
AMHERST TELEPHON COMPANY, CHEQUAMEGON COMMINCATIONS COOPERATIVE INCORPORATED, LAVALLE TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE and others
Sprint Communications Co. LP v. The Stoutland Telephone Co., et al
as 18-10826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STOUTLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY, AMHERST TELEPHON COMPANY, CHEQUAMEGON COMMINCATIONS COOPERATIVE INCORPORATED and others
Hager v. Hospira Worldwide, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05519
Defendant:
Hospira, Inc. and Hospira Worldwide, LLC
Plaintiff:
Rita M. Hager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson, et al v. Louisiana Legislatures et al
as 3:2018cv00529
Plaintiff:
Leslie Adams, Bruce Barksdale, Gerald Barnes and others
Defendant:
District Courts of this State and Louisiana Legislatures
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hager v. Underwood
as 3:2018cv00355
Petitioner:
Marion David Hager
Respondent:
Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hager et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc.et al
as 2:2017cv14397
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Jo Hager and Richard M Hager
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sandoz, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Hager et al
as 2:2017cv10118
Plaintiff:
Sheila M. Davis
Defendant:
Julie Hager, Andrew C Christenberry, Christenberry and Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Hager v. Todd G. Rowan
as 17-11147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. HAGER
Defendant - Appellee:
DBG PARTNERS, INCORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
