Cases 11 - 20 of 261
Smith v. Desantis
as 23-10485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Franklin C. Smith, as next friend Taya Kyle
Defendant / Appellee:
Ron Desantis, Governor, Benjamin Crump, Jason L. Jones, Judge and others
Pettieway v. Kerry et al
as 2:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Marlon James Pettieway
Defendant:
Supervisor Kerry, Jon Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettieway v. Monceaux et al
as 2:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Marlon James Pettieway
Defendant:
Sarah Monceaux and L Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettieway v. Strent et al
as 2:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Marlon Pettieway and Marlon James Pettieway
Defendant:
W Strent, L Jones, M Courville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Desantis et al
as 6:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Franklin C Smith
Defendant:
Ron Desantis, Benjamin Crump, Jason L Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv01055
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Jones
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC and Camping World RV Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Napoleon et al v. Danny Herman Trucking Inc et al
as 3:2022cv01896
Plaintiff:
Timothy Napoleon, II and La Derika L Jones
Defendant:
Danny Herman Trucking Inc and Ramon E Casiano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jones et al v. King et al
as 4:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones, Ysidro Renteria and William L. Jones Carr
Defendant:
Amber M. King, Chris H. Busse and Brandon W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. Stone et al
as 4:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Andrew James
Defendant:
Lula Stone, LPN, Olivia Brooks, LPN, Shameilia Smith, LPN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
