Cases 11 - 20 of 6,829
Carroll v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv01440
Plaintiff:
LaShawn Carroll
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Mercado v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Leslie Darlene Mercado
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin v. The City of Las Vegas et al
as 5:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Stacey Bernard Martin
Defendant:
The City of Las Vegas, Judge Linda Marquis, Dalia Marina-Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dillion v. Martin
as 24-30360
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dillion
Defendant:
Jimmie Martin, Jr., Argie Mark, Jr. and National Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davis v. Warren et al
as 6:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Daryl L. Davis
Defendant:
Don Warren, Shirley McKellar, Deborah Pullum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hill
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Waldrup & Household v. Leva et al
as 4:2024cv02171
Plaintiff:
Aisha Waldrup & Household
Defendant:
Jeff Leva, Meghan Rolla, Stanley Middleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garza v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Alma Laura Garza
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Conness v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Matthew Russell Conness
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
