Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Griffin v. Lil Daddy Pizza, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00195
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Griffin
Defendant:
Matthew Magee, Lil Daddy Pizza, LLC and Big Daddy Pizza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2021cv00452
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Davis and Sheed Davis
Defendant:
Louisiana State, JPSO Officials Jail, Med Fusion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rasheed v. Miraj Communications, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00707
Defendant:
Ashraf Umar, Miraj Communications, LLC and Miraj Communications, LLC doing business as Metro PCS
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Rasheed
Davis v. JPSO Officials et al
as 3:2021cv00437
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Davis and Sheed
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Med Fusion, JPSO Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021xc00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
USA v. Rasheed Kayode
as 20-20569
Defendant / Appellant:
Rasheed Babatunde Kayode, also known as Babatunde Rasheed Kayode, also known as Rasheed Babatunde Kayode
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Akinsanya v. USA Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:17-cr-00119-2.
as 4:2020cv03523
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rasheed Akinsanya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Akinsanya v. The United States of America Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:17-cr-119-2.
as 4:2020cv03008
Respondent:
The United States of America
Petitioner:
Rasheed Akinsanya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rasheed v. Hall et al
as 1:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Anthony G. Beasley, Joshua Csaszar, Andrew C. Mills and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Akeem Abdullah Rasheed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
