Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Parham et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2020cv00572
Defendant: Lynn Fitch and Michael D. Watson, Jr.
Plaintiff: Jed Oppenheim, Mississippi State Conference of the N.A.A.C.P., League of Women Voters Mississippi and others
Amicus Curiae: The State of California, The State of New York, The State of Rhode Island and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson Women's Hlth Org v. Dobbs We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-60455
Plaintiff / Appellee: JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, on behalf of itself and its patients and SACHEEN CARR-ELLIS, M.D., M.P.H., on behalf of herself and her patients
Defendant / Appellant: KENNETH CLEVELAND, M.D., in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure and THOMAS E. DOBBS, M.D., M.P.H., in his official capacity as State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health
Amicus Curiae: Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson, Mississippi, Roman Catholic Diocese of Biloxi, Mississippi, Information Society Project at Yale Law School and others
State of Texas v. USA Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-10011
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Intervenor: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF IOWA, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF OHIO, 483 FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBAL NATIONS, ILYA SOMIN and others
Not Classified By Court: FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
Polansky et al v. Executive Health Resources Inc. et al
as 1:2018mc00331
Interested Party: Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
Defendant: Executive Health Resources Inc.
Movant: M.D., M.P.H. Jesse Polansky and United States of America
Plaintiff: M.D., M.P.H. Jesse Polansky, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, The Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Respondent: Seton Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Chihi et al v. Catholic Health Initiatives et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00123
Plaintiff: Hichem Chihi, United States of America, The State of Texas and others
Defendant: Catholic Health Initiatives, Chi-St. Luke's Health, Baylor College of Medicine and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Horswell v. State of Minnesota
as 3:2018cv00043
Petitioner: Phillip Harold Horswell
Respondent: State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kennedy v. The State of Alabama et al
as 5:2016cv01116
Defendant: Democratic National Party, Republican National Party, State of Connecticut and others
Plaintiff: Stephen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perales v. The United States Government et al
as 1:2015cv00918
Respondent: The Hon. Warden Mr. B.R. Jett, et al, N.Y., etc, Olmstead County Olmstead and others
Petitioner: Richard Perales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America et al v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00434
Plaintiff: United States of America , Keith J Edgett , State of California and others
Defendant: Kimberly-Clark Corporation , Kimberly-Clark Global Sales LLC , Halyard Health Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Guerdon Green, ex rel. et al., v. AmerisourceBergen Corporation, et al.
as 4:2015cv00379
Plaintiff: Guerdon Green, ex rel,, The State of Indiana, The State of Georgia and others
Defendant: AmerisourceBergen Corporation, McKesson Corporation and Cardinal Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?