Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 36
State of Texas v. USA Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-10011
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Intervenor: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF IOWA, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF OHIO, 483 FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBAL NATIONS, ILYA SOMIN and others
Not Classified By Court: FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
Wilson v. State of Wisconsin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00081
Plaintiff: Delmar Wilson, Jr.
Defendant: State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-10545
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Defendant - Appellant: JOHN KOSKINEN, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Polansky et al v. Executive Health Resources Inc. et al
as 1:2018mc00331
Interested Party: Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
Defendant: Executive Health Resources Inc.
Movant: M.D., M.P.H. Jesse Polansky and United States of America
Plaintiff: M.D., M.P.H. Jesse Polansky, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, The Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Respondent: Seton Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
State of Nevada, et al v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al
as 17-41130
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARY ZIEGLER, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Policy of the Wage and Hour Division and others
Movant - Appellant: TEXAS AFL-CIO
Franciscan Alliance, Inc., et al v. Norris Cochran, Acting Secy, et al
as 17-10135
Plaintiff - Appellee: FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE, INCORPORATED, CHRISTIAN MEDICAL AND DENTAL SOCIETY, SPECIALTY PHYSICIANS OF ILLINOIS, L.L.C. and others
Movant - Appellant: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF TEXAS and RIVER CITY GENDER ALLIANCE
Natl Federation of Indep Bus, et al v. Thomas Perez, Secretary, et al
as 17-10054
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS, LUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant - Appellant: THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ANDREW D. AUERBACH and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
State of Nevada, et al v. LABR, et al
as 16-41606
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Kennedy v. The State of Alabama et al
as 5:2016cv01116
Defendant: Democratic National Party, Republican National Party, State of Connecticut and others
Plaintiff: Stephen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-11534
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS, HARROLD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT (TX), STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, JOHN B. KING, in his Official Capacity as United States Secretary of Education and others
Movant - Appellant: RACHEL JONA TUDOR, Dr.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?