Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Speights et al v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2017cv05433
Plaintiff:
Dionnandra Davis Speights
Defendant:
Hector Sanchez, USA Global Solutions, Inc. and Progressive Express Insurance Company
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Barry Sorrell
Intervenor_defendant:
Dionnandra Davis Speights , Hector Sanchez, William F. Brown Family Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2017cv01393
Plaintiff:
William George Brown
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Synthes Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruedelstein v. U.S. Concrete, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00266
Plaintiff:
Hans Ruedelstein
Defendant:
U.S. Concrete, Inc., William J. Sandbrook, William M. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Michael Lane v. Gaye Karriker, et al
as 16-40400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LANE
Defendant - Appellee:
GAYE L. KARRIKER, SHAUNA VESTAL, WILLIAM D. BROWN and others
Lane v. Karriker et al
as 6:2015cv01149
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Defendant:
Gaye L Karriker, Shauna Vestal, William D Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paprock v. Brown
as 1:2015cv01073
Defendant:
William Joseph Brown
Plaintiff:
Dara Paprock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pelly v. City of Crowley et al
as 6:2015cv00463
Plaintiff:
Dallas Pelly, Jr
Defendant:
City of Crowley, Police Dept of Crowley, K P Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. William Wright
as 15-50092
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM EARL BROWN WRIGHT, also known as William Brown-Wright, also known as William Earl Brown, also known as William Earl Wright-Brown, also known as William Brown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
