Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Swindle et al v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
as 6:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
Steven Swindle , Sarah Swindle and Sabrina Callison
Defendant:
MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fuentes et al v. City Of Tyler et al
as 2:2013cv00474
Plaintiff:
Yaneth Fuentes , Hector Alfonso Fuentes , Victor Javier Fuentes and others
Defendant:
Texas City Of Tyler , Gary M Swindle and Matthew Riggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuentes et al v. City Of Tyler et al
as 6:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Yaneth Fuentes , Hector Alfonso Fuentes , Victor Javier Fuentes and others
Defendant:
Texas City Of Tyler , Gary M Swindle and Matthew Riggle
Mediator:
George Richard Grainger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brent Myers v. M. Swindle, et al
as 13-10236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENT W. MYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
M. SWINDLE, Dallas Policeman, S. TOMIYAMA, Dallas Policeman, JOHN DOE, White Male Dallas Policeman and others
Swindle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00255
Plaintiff:
Reda F. Swindle
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Brent Myers v. M. Swindle, et al
as 12-10559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRENT W. MYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
M. SWINDLE, Dallas Policeman, S. TOMIYAMA, Dallas Policeman, JOHN DOE, White Male Dallas Policeman and others
Swindle v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00019
Plaintiff:
Roger Neil Swindle
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Swindle v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00323
Plaintiff:
Anita Swindle
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hernandez et al v. Han Nara Enterprises, LP d/b/a Ashley Furniture HomeStore et al
as 5:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Feliciano Hernandez , Michael Swindle , Mark Salinas and others
Defendant:
Han Nara Enterprises, LP d/b/a Ashley Furniture HomeStore , Han Nara Management, LLC , Richard Choi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
